Legal Opinion

Robertson v. White

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided June 10, 1986No. 85-2044, 85-2096, 85-2155 and 85-2259PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff class, holders of demand notes issued by the Farmers Co-op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., has moved for summary judgment on its state securities law claims against certain Co-op directors and employees. The class alleges that the Co-op demand note program constituted a sale of “securities” as that term is defined in the Arkansas Securities Act. Ark.Stat. Ann. §§ 67-1235 et seq. (1980 Repl.). The class maintains that inasmuch as these demand notes were neither registered during the period April 8, 1980, to October 28, 1983, nor…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,494 Great Western Bank & Trust v. Sol KotzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Traylor v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Arthur Young & Co. v. RevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Hines v. Data Line Systems, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State Ex Rel. Mays v. RidenhourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  5. Lean v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API