Legal Opinion
Salvo v. Thatcher
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 25, 2005No. 54837-9-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
116 P.3d 1019 (2005)
Michael J. SALVO, Appellant,
v.
David E. THATCHER, Carol J. Thatcher, husband and wife, Respondents.
No. 54837-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division one.
July 25, 2005.
B. Jacob Bozeman, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Jackson Schmidt, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
SCHINDLER, J.
¶ 1 According to the Default provision of the Residential Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (REPSA), if the buyer "fails, without legal excuse, to complete the purchase of the Property," the seller is entitled to retain the earnest money deposit.[1] The buyer,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Reynolds v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Reynolds v. HicksWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- US Life Credit Life Ins. v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- U.S. Life Credit Life Insurance v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Rorvig v. DouglasWashington Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Herring v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Herring v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- North Oakes Manor, App/cross/resp v. 2nd Half Llc, Res/cross-appCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Northwood Estates, Llc v. Lennar Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020