Legal Opinion

Eaton v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 2001No. 20010003PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Clifford Scott Eaton appeals from an East Central Judicial District Court order denying his application for post-con-. viction relief. Eaton argues violations of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (“Detainers Act”) resulted in a manifest injustice and he therefore should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea. Eaton argues the Detainers Act defects deprived the district court of jurisdiction and therefore his guilty plea was ineffective. Concluding the district court had jurisdiction, and concluding Eaton waived any defect by entering a plea of guilty, we…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. Samuel G. RamosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. SlapnickaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. McMorrow v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. BoothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API