Nassif v. National Presto Industries, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
RULING GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WOLLE, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, reduced to essentials, presents three questions: (1) Did defendant, manufacturer of a space heater, act negligently or produce a defective product in failing to warn users the heater could burn them; (2) Did defendant owe a duty to give special warning to users who have sensory loss; and (3) Were the instructions accompanying defendant’s space heater inadequate or misleading, making the product defective or defendant liable for negligence? The court answers no to all three…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric Cooperative, City of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa v. Associated Electric Cooperative, Inc. Central Electric Power Cooperative Northeast Missouri Electric Power Cooperative Tri-County Electric Cooperative Association MacOn Electric Cooperative and Ralls County Electric CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Aller v. Rodgers MacHinery Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
- Henkel v. R AND BOTTLING CO.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Santoro Ex Rel. Santoro v. DonnellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993