Legal Opinion

Hurd v. Hines

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1956No. Docket 54 Calendar 46,641PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Plaintiffs are the owners of land on Saginaw Bay in Huron county. Contiguous thereto on the north is property owned by defendants Hines. The boundary line between said properties has never been definitely established. Claiming that the de fendants had encroached on their property and were withholding possession thereof from them, plaintiffs on April 17, 1953, instituted ejectment proceedings. The defendants answered the declaration, denying plaintiffs’ claims and asserting ownership in defendants Hines of the property in dispute. The cause was tried before the circuit judge without a jury and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gregory v. ThorrezMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Township of Pontiac v. FeatherstoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Beaubien v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Briggs v. PrevostMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Ridgley v. RomaMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glass v. GoeckelMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Glass v. GoeckelMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API