Legal Opinion
Lippes v. Bradley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 15, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of defendants for partial summary judgment because defendants were ready, willing and able to convey good and marketable title, free and clear of encumbrances or material defects, to the property described in the contract of sale (see, Cerf v Diener, 210 NY 156; cf., Empire Career Ctr. v Town of Schuyler, 203 AD2d 906 [decided herewith]). The fact that a portion of the deck and the brick patio extended into a common area owned by the Rivermist Condominium Association does not constitute an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Fresh Pond Road Associates v. Estate of SchachtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Cerf v. . DienerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Douglas Elliman-Gibbons & Ives, Inc. v. KellermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- DeJong v. MandelbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Dissolution of Hirschfeld, Stern, Moyer & Ross, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Cadwallader v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Lawrence v. MountainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999