Hidley v. Rockefeller
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The test of plaintiffs’ standing to challenge the integrity of the legislative process of which they complain is that of personal aggrievement (St. Clair v. Yonkers Raceway, 13 N Y 2d 72) and this has not been demonstrated. Plaintiffs ’ real quarrel is with the amount of the appropriations, not with the form or method whereby they were requested and enacted; and there is no logical connection between the job losses now apprehended and the form of the budget bills now attacked. Neither is there any showing that any positions would be more secure had the budgetary and legislative…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Boryszewski v. BrydgesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Korn v. GulottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Pataki v. New York State AssemblyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- New York Public Interest Research Group, Inc. v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Abrams v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.