Abrams v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtLupiano, J.
As aptly observed by Special Term (78 Misc 2d 938, 939-940, Markowitz, J.): "The stated purpose of this article 78 proceeding is to compel respondents to comply with the laws controlling noise in the New York City subways. Toward that end, petitioners, as individuals and in various official and representative capacities seek an order directing the New York City Transportation Authority and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, and their members 'to turn over immediately to petitioner, Robert Abrams’ the reports required by certain sections of the Public Authorities Law, and setting down…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Schieffelin v. Valentine KomfortNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- National Organization for Women v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- MATTER OF TAYLOR v. SiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Whalen v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cusick v. Lutheran Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. FormanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1989
- People v. RyalsNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- City of Plattsburgh v. MannixAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Faculty of the City University of New York Law School at Queens College v. MurphyNew York Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.