Legal Opinion

In the Interest of T.M.J.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 2010No. 09-08-00310-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STEVE McKEITHEN, Chief Justice.

C.L.H. appeals the termination of her parental rights to the minor children T.M.J. and X.K.J. C.L.H. raises two issues for our consideration. In her first issue, C.L.H. argues that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s finding that termination was in the best interest of the children. In her second issue, C.L.H. asserts that the jury charge was overly broad, thereby violating her “constitutional rights to due process and the Fourteenth Amendment.” We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

The Evidence

C.L.H. testified that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In the Interest of E.T. and J.T., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2026
  2. M.P.G. v. Department of Family and Protective Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
  3. in the Interest of J.C.P. and M.E.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  4. in the Interest of J.C.P. and M.E.S., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012
  5. in the Interest of P.R.R., the Child, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API