Pryor v. Winter
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
The plaintiffs are the children of John E. Church, deceased, and they brought this action to quiet their title to undivided interests in certain lots of land in the town of Red Bluff, in Tehama County, including the undivided half of a lot described as lot 22 in block 12. The court below, sitting without a jury, gave judgment to plaintiffs for the other property involved, but held that plaintiffs are not the owners of or entitled to the possession of any part of lot 22, and that defendant is the owner of all of said last-mentioned lot by adverse possession, and rendered judgment accordingly.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson ex dem. Hardenbergh v. SchoonmakerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Webb v. WinterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by24 opinions
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Akley v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- J. Bryant Kasey and Maryann Kasey v. Molybdenum Corporation of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Higgins v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- McClanahan's Administrator v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1918
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.