Legal Opinion

State v. Moseley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 29, 1994No. 385A92PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error is to the charge of the court. The court charged on reasonable doubt as follows:

A reasonable doubt is a doubt based on reason and common sense arising out of some or all of the evidence that has been presented or the lack or insufficiency of the evidence, as the case may be. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that fully satisfies or entirely convinces you of the defendant’s guilt.

Defined another way, a reasonable doubt is not a vain, imaginary, or fanciful doubt; but is a sane, rational doubt. When it is said that the jury must be…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  5. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API