Pryatel v. J.S.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] J.S. appealed from a district court order authorizing his continued treatment at the North Dakota State Hospital for one year. J.S. alleges the district court was clearly erroneous in ordering continuing treatment. Further, J.S. alleges the district court was clearly erroneous in failing to adequately determine the least restrictive treatment as an alternative to hospitalization. We affirm the district court’s order.
[¶ 2] This is J.S.’s seventh appeal to this Court from various mental health commitment or treatment orders. See In the Interest of J.S., 2001 ND…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Interest of RNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of JSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Van Valkenburg v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Pryatel v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Abordo v. J.S.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re JsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- In Re JsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006