Legal Opinion
Claude Neon Lights, Inc. v. E. MacHlett & Son
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 21, 1929No. 137PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is a sequel of the decision of this court upon another occasion [Claude Neon Lights v. E. Machlett & Son, 27 F.(2d) 702], in which the patent was held valid and infringed by the electrode there in suit. The general nature of the invention and its scope we then considered at length, and it is not necessary to repeat what we said. The supplemental bill was filed to bring within the claims another sort of electrode, whose infringement we then declined to consider. It consists of an iron cathode whose area is less than one half that of the minimum which the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- White v. DunbarSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Keystone Bridge Co. v. Phoenix Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Reece Button-Hole Ma. Co. v. Globe Button-Hole Ma. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Georgia-Pacific Corporation v. United States Plywood CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Saco-Lowell Shops v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Directoplate Corp. v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1931
- Engineering Development Laboratories v. Radio Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.