Kelley v. Creston Buick Sales Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentGarfield, J.
(dissenting)—I respectfully dissent from Division III of the majority opinion which holds the contract in question too indefinite as to price to be enforceable. I agree with Division I which holds plaintiff’s petition sufficiently alleges defendant’s ability to perform the contract.
The majority attaches great importance to 1his provision of the contract: “It is also expressly agreed that you do not obligate yourself except insofar as the product of the factory and the requirements óf other customers will in your judgment, permit * * The provision does not fairly mean that elate of delivery is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- DeMoss v. Conart Motor Sales, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
- Goodman v. Henry Caplan, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1946
- Kirsch v. ZubalskyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946