Legal Opinion

Lang v. Prindle

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1910No. Docket No. 4PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Van Burén; Des Yoignes, J. Case by George S. Lang against Eugene E. Prindle for fraud. Judgment for plaintiff; defendant brings er-xor.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit was commenced by summons in July, 1908. The plaintiff recovered a judgment for $6,500, which it is sought to review by writ of error.

Negotiations were had between the parties to this litigation running through several months for the exchange and purchase of real éstate. A land contract was finally made in which the following appears:

*257“Article of agreement, made and concluded this 25th day of September in the year 1905, between Eugene F. Prindle and Emma A. Prindle, his wife, ■ parties of the first part, and George S. Lang and Amelia Lang, as husband and wife jointly, parties of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickey v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Speier v. OpferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Fisher v. ProvinMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Vinton v. BeamerMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Manwaring v. PowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davis v. WardowskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API