Legal Opinion
Council for Urological Interes v. Kathleen Sebelius
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 23, 2011No. 11-5030PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Although the Medicare Act provides for judicial review of reimbursement decisions, it requires that claimants first exhaust their administrative remedies. In Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc., the Supreme Court recognized an exception to this requirement for cases where its application “would not lead to a channeling of review through the agency, but would mean no review at all.” 529 U.S. 1, 17, 120 S.Ct. 1084, 146 L.Ed.2d 1 (2000). In this case, an association of doctor-owned equipment providers…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowen v. Michigan Academy of Family PhysiciansSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coalition for Underground Expansion v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- David De Csepel v. Republic of HungaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- National Security Counselors v. Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Physician Hospitals of America v. KathleenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Family Rehab., Inc. v. AzarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.