Legal Opinion

Carter v. Volunteer Apparel, Inc.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1992PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The primary issue in this workers’ compensation appeal is whether an injury, sus tained by Plaintiff-employee on her employer’s premises prior to the time work began, is compensable. Plaintiffs injury occurred in the break area of Defendant’s plant and the Chancellor found that her injury was not compensable because it did not occur within a reasonable time prior to work. Plaintiff appeals.

THE FACTS

Plaintiff-Appellant, Betty Jean Carter, is 52 years of age and all her adult work life has been spent operating sewing machines in apparel plants. In 1986 she began working…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lollar v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Fashion Hosiery Shops v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Dupper v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lima v. William H. Haskell Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1965

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wait v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of IllinoisTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bailey v. BatchelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. McCormick v. Aabakus Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Tickles v. PNC BankSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Gaines v. Dist. of Columbia Dep't of Emp't Servs.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API