Legal Opinion · Dissent

Middleton Ex Rel. Middleton v. Northwest Airlines

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1999No. C6-98-2418Published

1DissentPaul H. Anderson, J.

I respectfully dissent because, in reaching the question of the compensability of suicide, the majority provides a solution for a legal issue not properly before our court. The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals essentially placed the cart before the horse by ruling that “employerfs] and insurerfs] do not have primary liability for [an] employee’s major depressive disorder and suicide” before addressing the factual issue of whether James Middelton’s suicide stemmed from a work-related injury. The majority, in its zeal to correct the WCCA’s legal conclusion, exacerbates the WCCA’s error by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Lipka v. Minnesota School Employees Ass'n, Local 1980Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  3. Stabs v. City of TowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Egeland v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Krotzer v. Browning-Ferris/Woodlake Sanitation ServiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API