Legal Opinion
Pico Products, Inc. v. Eagle Comtronics, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 11, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiff asserts causes of action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process and defamation arising from an earlier action brought against it by this corporate defendant (see Eagle Comtronics v Pico, Inc., 89 AD2d 803, mot for lv to app den 58 NY2d 601). The other defendants are officers and the attorney for the corporate defendant. Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint, dated July 6,1982, on the ground that the complaint fails to state any cause of action…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Williams v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- George v. Mt. Sinai HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Boose v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Marks v. . TownsendNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Von Bulow Ex Rel. Auersperg v. Von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Hansen v. PetroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Cuillo v. ShupnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993