Legal Opinion

Purcellville National Bank v. Carter

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1958No. 2232PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Appellant brought suit on a note against appellee, an accommodation endorser. When both parties asked for summary judgment, the court granted appellee’s motion on the ground that there was no consideration for the note. Appellant’s main contention on this appeal is that the court’s ruling was incorrect because there were issues of fact involved on the question of consideration which precluded summary judgment.

We have examined the pleadings, depositions and answers to various interrogatories in order to determine whether there was a material issue of fact. All doubts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. White v. LuberDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Abrams v. American Security & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  3. Phenix National Bank of Providence v. RaiaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1942
  4. Ryan v. Security Savings & Commercial BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  5. Bost v. Rexine Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. EARLY SETTLERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. SchweidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Groner v. DryerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Carter v. Purcellville National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
  4. Pallie v. Riggs National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API