Bost v. Rexine Co.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The Rexine Company, now defendant in error, was plain*796tiff in the municipal court, and sued James Lee Bost, now the plaintiff in error, claiming judgment against him upon a certain promissory note.

There is no issue of fact involved in the case. It appears by stipulation that on March 7, 1923, one R. Spencer Palmer prepared and signed as maker a certain promissory note for the sum of $279.25, payable on May' 20th after date, with a blank left for the name of the payee. The note was then indorsed in blank by the defendant, James Lee Bost, for the accommodation of the maker,…