Legal Opinion
McCree v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 18, 2014No. 20/14PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
We decide whether Maryland’s trademark counterfeiting statute, Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law (2002, 2012 Repl. Vol.) (“CR”) § 8-611—which prohibits, among other things, the willful display of goods that have “retail value” and bear a counterfeit mark—is facially overbroad or facially void-for-vagueness. Analyzing CR § 8-611’s plain language, we hold that CR § 8-611 is neither facially overbroad nor facially void-for-vagueness.
BACKGROUND
The State, Respondent, charged Bernard Delaney McCree, Jr. (“McCree”), Petitioner, with numerous crimes, including violating CR § 8-611. In the Circuit Court for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dept. of Env. v. Carroll Cnty. Frederick Cnty. v. Dept. of Env.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Hailes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Twigg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Rovin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Dept. of Env. v. Carroll Cnty. Frederick Cnty. v. Dept. of Env.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.