Legal Opinion

Swift Transportation Co. v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 10, 2010No. 1 CA-TX 09-0002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OROZCO, Judge.

¶ 1 Swift Transportation Company, Inc., (Taxpayer) appeals from the tax court’s judgment holding that Maricopa County did not violate Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 42-15105 (2006) 1 in revaluing Taxpayer’s property for the 2007 tax year. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Initial Assessment

¶2 The Maricopa County Assessor (the Assessor) values real property at full cash value. A.R.S. § 42-13051.B.2 (Supp.2009). 2 For property tax purposes, “full cash value” means “the value determined as prescribed by statute. If no…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Calmat of Arizona v. State Ex Rel. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Bills v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cornerstone Hospital of Southeast Arizona v. Ernest H. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  2. Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Baker v. University Physicians Healthcare, Wittman, Arizona Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Van Baalen v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API