Legal Opinion

Cobb v. Welcher

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 18, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Action by Ida M. Cobb against EL Eugene Welcher and others to recover damages for personal injuries, sustained by plaintiff - while working in defendants’ factory. Plaintiff moves' for a new trial after a nonsuit at the Monroe circuit, upon exceptions ordered to be heard -at general term in the first instance.

1Opinion of the CourtHaight, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for a personal injury. The defendants were operating a factory in the City of Rochester. There was a long table extending through the factory, upon which sewing machines were placed. The table was 2 feet 6 inches high. Underneath the table, in the center thereof, was a line of shafting, extending the length of the table, 20 inches above the floor, one end of which projected about 3| inches beyond the table. The sewing machines were operated by means of belts around the shafting. At the end of the table, where the shaft projected, a box was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pauley v. Steam Gauge & Lantern Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Stringham v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Knisley v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Glens Falls Portland Cement Co. v. Travelers' InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Caspar v. LewinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Robertson v. FordIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Miller v. Kimberly & Clark Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Martin v. Walker & Williams Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API