Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Markham v. Elmquist

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 17, 1937No. 31,396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel the village of Hopkins and its officers to publish in the relator’s newspaper, which is the only legal newspaper published in that village, a detailed annual report pursuant to L. 1911, c. 352. The relator is a resident, voter, and taxpayer of the respondent village, which operates under L. 1885, c. 115. The trial court held that the 1911 law applied to the village of Hopkins and that such report must be published.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether or not L. 1911, c. 352, applies to the village of Hopkins. R. L.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Canajoharie National Bank v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. People v. . WilmerdingNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Grozbach v. Common School District No. 65Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Mitchell v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Heidrich v. HeffelfingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API