Murphy v. Appelli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The matter pleaded in paragraphs Fifth to Ninth of the answer is not sustainable as a counterclaim or as a partial defense for ‘there are no ultimate facts of damage set forth which present an issue either by way of defense or counterclaim.
The facts alleged as a complete defense" and counterclaim in paragraphs Tenth to Fifteenth of the answer are clearly insufficient as a defense. In an action such as this to recover damages for fraud and deceit, it is not a defense for defendant to assert that he has sustained damage by reason of his later unlawful arrest and prosecution therefor at the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sporn v. Hudson Transit LinesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knapp Engraving Co. v. Keystone Photo Engraving Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Hairston v. BroadwaterNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Ippisch v. Moricz-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Stuyvesant Insurance v. MatusowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Ames v. KnoblerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963