Legal Opinion · Dissent
Ames v. Knobler
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 9, 1963Published
1DissentMcNally, J.
The order entered April 24, 1962, granting defendant leave to serve an amended answer, should be reversed and the motion denied. In this action for malicious prosecution and abuse of process, the counterclaim grounded on nuisance should not be permitted. The complaint and counterclaim do not involve common issues of fact or law and the interposition of the counterclaim will prejudice an orderly trial of the issues relative to the plaintiff’s complaint. (Murphy v. Appelli, 273 App. Div. 261; Sporn v. Hudson Tr. Lines, 265 App. Div. 360; Ippisch v. Moricz-Smith, 1 A D 2d 968.) Moreover, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McFarlane v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Delaney v. Philhern Realty Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Hayes v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Massi v. Alben Builders, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
- Massi v. Alben Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.