Legal Opinion
Sporn v. Hudson Transit Lines
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 21, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
There are six causes of action set forth in the com-: plaint. Five of these are in negligence to recover damages for *361personal injuries, for loss of services and for injury to property, it being claimed that appellant carelessly operated its bus as a result of which it collided with the automobile in which respondents were riding.
The other cause of action is one wherein respondent Harry Sporn seeks to recover from appellant damages for malicious prosecution. It is charged that following the accident appellant maliciously caused the arrest of Harry Sporn for reckless driving.
An application by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gerseta Corp. v. Silk Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Datz v. Economy Cotton Goods Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- People ex rel. Michael J. Adrian Corp. v. SextonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dasheff v. Bath & Tennis Club of Westhampton, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Ippisch v. Moricz-SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Murphy v. AppelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
- Hoff v. State Farm InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Pierce v. International Harvester Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.