Legal Opinion

Biesinger v. Behunin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1978No. 15452PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Justice:

Defendants appeal from a judgment forfeiting payments totaling $30,000 made toward the purchase of a dwelling and also forfeiting the sum of $1,032 expended as improvements thereon. Plaintiffs cross-appeal seeking an award of actual damages for breach of contract in excess of the sum forfeited. Affirmed. No costs awarded.

The agreement of the parties is set forth in a document entitled “Earnest Money Receipt and Offer to Purchase” and by the terms thereof the defendants agreed to pay $90,000 for the dwelling, payable $10,000 down, and the balance of $80,000 to be paid July 10,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carlson v. HamiltonUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stubbs v. HemmertUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Forrester v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Cole v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bramwell Inv. Co. v. Uggla Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
  4. Bekins Bar v. Ranch v. HuthUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hal Taylor Associates v. Unionamerica, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API