Daniel L. Carroll and Ingrid N. Carroll, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SACK, Circuit Judge.
This ease arises out of the plaintiff Daniel L. Carroll's investment in a limited partnership — Stevens Recycling Associates (“Stevens” or “Stevens partnership”). On the basis of a $16,667 investment in 1982, Plaintiffs-Appellees Daniel L. and Ingrid N. Carroll (“the Carrolls”) reduced the amount of the income tax liability that they reported for that year by $32,152. After the Tax Court held in a related case in 1992 that transactions of the kind employed by the Stevens partnership were a sham, the tax matters partner of the Stevens partnership entered into a settlement…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Scofield v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Priestley v. Headminder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Republic of Ecuador v. ChevronTexaco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Fidelity International Currency Advisor a Fund, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Teresa Tiernan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.