Legal Opinion

Daniel L. Carroll and Ingrid N. Carroll, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 5, 2003No. Docket 02-6083, 02-6117(XAP)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SACK, Circuit Judge.

This ease arises out of the plaintiff Daniel L. Carroll's investment in a limited partnership — Stevens Recycling Associates (“Stevens” or “Stevens partnership”). On the basis of a $16,667 investment in 1982, Plaintiffs-Appellees Daniel L. and Ingrid N. Carroll (“the Carrolls”) reduced the amount of the income tax liability that they reported for that year by $32,152. After the Tax Court held in a related case in 1992 that transactions of the kind employed by the Stevens partnership were a sham, the tax matters partner of the Stevens partnership entered into a settlement…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Scofield v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Priestley v. Headminder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Republic of Ecuador v. ChevronTexaco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Fidelity International Currency Advisor a Fund, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  5. Teresa Tiernan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API