Legal Opinion

Street Improvement District No. 419 v. Pinkert

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 1952No. 4-9764PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

This cáse presents varied questions that arise from the fact that our laws permit overlapping improvement districts to foreclose their tax liens separately and thereby acquire independent titles to the same property. Here this conflict of ownership results from successive foreclosure suits brought by a Little Bock sewer district and a Little Bock street district, the appellant. Each district bought in the land at its own sale.

In the court below this was a three-cornered controversy involving the title to two city lots. Pinkert, the first litigant, brought suit to quiet the title he had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Monheit v. CignaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gould v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  3. Deaner v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Board of Commissioners of McKinney Bayou Drainage District v. Board of Directors of Garland Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  5. Greer v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. HartsfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Park Corp. of Arkansas v. Tri-County Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API