Legal Opinion

United States v. Robles

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 1993No. Crim. 92-00047PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.

On April 22, 1992, following a two-day jury-trial before this court in Easton, Pennsylvania, defendants Jose Robles and Jose Croussett were both found guilty of conspiring to distribute cocaine-base and possessing cocaine-base with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. Defendant Robles was found not guilty of possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Presently before this court are post-trial motions by both defendants for a new trial. Neither defendant has been…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. United States v. BlountDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. United States v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. HAWES v. MAHALLEYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API