Legal Opinion

United States v. McLaughlin

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 15, 2000No. CRIM. 95-113PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GILES, Chief Judge.

Mark McLaughlin (“McLaughlin” or “Mark McLaughlin”) was convicted by a jury in 1996 of tax evasion under 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Following vacatur of his sentence on appeal but prior to new sentencing, McLaughlin filed a timely motion for new trial, asserting five grounds for relief: 1) that the government did not meet the requirements of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963) because it failed to turn over material exculpatory evidence to the defense prior to the trial; 2) that newly discovered evidence requires a new trial under Fed.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
  2. United States v. OnqueDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. United States v. IsaacDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API