Legal Opinion
Stormans, Inc. v. Selecky
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 8, 2007No. C07-5374RBLPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
RONALD B. LEIGHTON, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiffs are two pharmacists and one corporate pharmacy. They seek to enjoin the enforcement of regulations making it sanctionable for a pharmacy to permit a pharmacist-employee to refuse to fill a lawful prescription because of religious or moral objections. Specifically, they ask the Court to enjoin enforcement of provisions contained within certain regulations as applied to “Plan B” contraceptives, also known as the “morning after”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Morr-Fitz, Inc. v. BlagojevichIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.