Legal Opinion
McKenna v. Randle
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided February 28, 1917No. 1585-APublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JENNINGS, District Judge.
This is a suit brought in this court by a receiver appointed by a bankruptcy court, seeking aid from this court to enable him to perform the duty with which he is charged by statute.
*591I think the bankruptcy court, which appointed the plaintiff as its receiver, had full powers to make all orders necessary or proper in the premises (In re Knopf [D. C.] 144 Fed. 245), and I am at a loss to understand why the interposition of this court is sought.
The general equity jurisdiction of the United States district court for Alaska is not to be confounded with the equity…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re Fixen & Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1899
- Dempster v. Waters Pierce Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Horner-Gaylord Co. v. Miller & BennettDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1906
- In re KnopfDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1906
- Knickerbocker Steamboat Co. v. CusackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanna v. Brictson Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Rivoli Drug Co. v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Bingaman v. Commonwealth Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1924