Legal Opinion
Hicks v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided March 29, 1996No. 958, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Chief Judge.
After a non-jury trial in the Circuit Court for Harford County, appellant was convicted of having violated Md.Code art. 27, § 467A(b). That section makes it unlawful for any person
“to sell, rent, distribute, circulate, offer for sale, rental, distribution, or circulation, or possess for the purpose of sale, rental, distribution, or circulation, any phonograph record, disc, wire, tape, film, videocassette, or other article on which sounds or images have been transferred or stored unless the phonograph, record, disc, wire, tape, film, videocassette, or other article bears…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
- Professional Staff Nurses Ass'n v. Dimensions Health Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Robinson v. New Line Cinema Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.