Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Kearns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 14, 1998Published

1Concurrence

Friedmann, J.,

concurs and votes to affirm the judgment appealed from with the following memorandum: Although I am obliged by State law to concur with the majority’s decision to affirm, I write separately to address the limited issue of the apparent unreviewability of a convicted sex offender’s “risk level determination” under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law Art 6-C) (hereinafter SORA or the Act), or New York’s version of New Jersey’s so-called Megan’s Law.

While not minimizing in any way the crimes of which these offenders have been found guilty, I consider it troubling that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. People v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. SalaamNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. CashAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API