Legal Opinion

People v. Cash

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Motion for permission to proceed as poor person denied. Memorandum: Defendant purports to appeal from an order of County Court determining, pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA), that he is a level three sex offender. Except when the issue is raised on appeal from a judgment of conviction, a classification determination pursuant to SORA may not be challenged on appeal (see, People v Lyday, 241 AD2d 950; see also, People v Freeman, 236 AD2d 897; People v Stevens, 235 AD2d 440, lv granted 90 NY2d 864). The proper procedure for challenging a classification determination under SORA…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. LydayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. People v. FreemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WrotenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Raphael S. v. LeventhalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. Hahlbohm, New York County Courts2007
  4. People v. KearnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. Sims v. SperrazzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API