Legal Opinion
United States v. Missouri
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided January 21, 2016No. Case No. 4:11 CV 77 RWSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff the United States of America, acting at the request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), filed this suit against defendant Ameren Missouri (“Am-eren”) on January 12, 2011. In its complaint, EPA alleges that Ameren committed various violations of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. (“CAA”), the Missouri State Implementation Plan (“SIP”), and Ameren’s Rush Island Plant Title V Permit, when it allegedly undertook major modifications at the Rush Island Plant in Festus,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Radlax Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ellis Crossley v. Georgia-Pacific CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Ameren MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. MissouriDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2017