Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunt v. Shoemaker

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1985No. 84-1454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

“The writ of mandamus * * * does not lie if performance of the act prayed for is impossible * * State, ex rel. Brown, v. Bd. of County Commrs. (1970), 21 Ohio St. 2d 62 [50 O.O.2d 159], syllabus. We therefore cannot order the Parole Board to set a hearing for relator to be held in 1977, even assuming he was entitled to it. Furthermore, since relator was considered for parole in 1981, “[a] writ of mandamus will not issue to compel a public official to perform a-legal duty which has been completed.” State, ex rel. Breaux, v. Court of Common Pleas (1977), 50 Ohio St. 2d 164 [4 O.O.3d 352].

Relator…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State ex rel. Breaux v. Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. Brown v. Board of County Commrs.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Paluch v. Zita (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Nedea v. VoinovichDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Norman v. Franklin Cty., Unpublished Decision (6-29-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Paluch v. Zita (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API