Legal Opinion
Henschke v. Borough of Clayton
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 7, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 393 (1991)
598 A.2d 526
FRANK HENSCHKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BOROUGH OF CLAYTON AND CLAYTON POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted October 8, 1991.
Decided November 7, 1991.
Before Judges MICHELS, O'BRIEN and CONLEY.
Seymour Wasserstrum, attorney for appellant.
White & Williams, attorneys for respondents (Michael O. Kassak, on the letter brief).
The opinion of the court was delivered by O'BRIEN, J.A.D.
Plaintiff appeals from an order granting summary judgment to defendants. We affirm.
In April 1984, plaintiff's residence at…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davidson v. CannonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weiss v. New Jersey TransitSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- City of Birmingham v. BensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Saldana v. DiMedioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Optopics Laboratories Corp. v. Sherman Laboratories, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- OJINNAKA v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.