Legal Opinion
OJINNAKA v. City of Newark
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 22, 2010No. L-1473-07PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
18 A.3d 233 (2011)
420 N.J. Super. 22
Clement E. OJINNAKA, Estate of Arinzechukwu Ojinnaka, Lawritha Ojinnaka, Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF NEWARK, Newark Police Department, Defendants.
L-1473-07
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Essex County.
Decided January 22, 2010.
Alan Roth, Newark, for plaintiffs (Bendit Weinstock, P.C., attorneys).
Gary S. Lipshutz and Julien X. Neals, Newark, for defendants (Newark Corporation Counsel, attorneys).
KENNEDY, J.S.C.
Defendant City of Newark moves for summary judgment seeking to dismiss claims brought against it by the estate of Arinzechukwu ("Arinze") Ojinnaka,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Kolitch v. LindedahlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Tice v. CramerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ESTATE OF HIRAM A. GONZALEZ, ETC. VS. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY (L-2857-16, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020
- Estate of Hiram A. Gonzalez v. The City of Jersey City (084381) (Hudson County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2021