Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Union Pac. R.R. Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided March 28, 2018No. 8:16CV539PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Laurie Smith Camp, Chief United States District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 49, filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Co. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
The following facts are those stated in the parties' briefs, supported by pinpoint citations to evidence in the record, and admitted, or not properly resisted, by the opposing party as required by NECivR 56.11 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56.
*950Plaintiff Jon Higgins began working as a Locomotive Engineer for Union Pacific in 1976. Supp. Brief ¶ 7,…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Torgerson v. City of RochesterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Kolstad v. American Dental Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Baker v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Baldwin v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
- Harris v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Miller v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Mount v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.