Legal Opinion

Treiber & Straub, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 9, 2007No. 05-3743, 05-3896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, Circuit Judge.

Treiber & Straub, Inc. (“Treiber”), a fine-jewelry store in Wisconsin, needed to return a diamond ring to a California jewelry wholesaler. It turned to United Parcel Service, the world’s largest package delivery company and, using the UPS website, it arranged to send the package via “Next Day Air.” As part of the transaction, it purchased $50,000 in insurance, the maximum permitted.

The ring was worth more than double that $50,000 limit — a fact that gave rise to Treiber’s problems here after UPS lost the package. Treiber reimbursed the wholesaler for the full loss and then…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. American Airlines, Inc. v. WolensSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. register.com, Inc. v. Verio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Treiber & Straub, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API