Legal Opinion

Noland v. Haywood

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1933No. 1803PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

The District Court of Sheridan County declined to order the specific performance of an alleged contract for the exchange of certain property at the suit of the plaintiff and appellant, and, upon the close of his evidence, sustained the defendant’s and respondent’s motion for judgment in her favor. In the judgment thereafter entered, it was found by the court, among other things, that

“the plaintiff's said cause is based upon an alleged agreement in writing made between plaintiff and defendant for the sale of real estate; that said alleged agreement in writing is insufficiently…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hurley v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Webb v. RitterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Deepwater Investments, Limited v. Jackson Hole Ski Corporation and Paul M. McCollisterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  2. Fowler v. FowlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Jerry K. Davis v. Harmony Development, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Wallis v. BoslerWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Williams v. DietzWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API