Legal Opinion

In Re Nomination Petition of Farnese

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2011No. 6 EAP 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF PER CURIAM ORDER

justice McCaffery.

In 2008, Appellee, Lawrence Farnese, Jr., then a candidate for state senator, filed a nomination petition to be on the Democratic Party’s primary election ballot. Pursuant to 25 P.S. § 2872.1(13), a nomination petition for that office must contain at least 500 signatures, and Appellee’s petition contained 1778 signatures. When the validity of the signatures was challenged on a number of grounds in the Commonwealth Court, Appellee withdrew 934 signatures on the advice of counsel, who agreed that the withdrawn signatures were invalid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re Nomination of FlahertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. In Re Nomination of CianfraniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. In Re DriscollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. In Re Nomination Paper of NaderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Nomination Petition of BeyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. J. Morley, Jr. v. L Farnese, Jr., K. GreenbergCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Hendrix v. JaegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  4. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. In Re Nomination Petition of ValentySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API