Legal Opinion
State v. Reddick
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 2, 1988No. 5421PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.
The defendant was convicted, after trial to a jury, of burglary in the first degree, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (1), and criminal possession of a firearm, in violation of General Statutes § 53a-217. From that judgment, the defendant appeals.
Three of the claims the defendant presses on appeal will not be reviewed owing to the defendant’s failure to comply with Practice Book § 4065 (d), which expressly provides that briefs shall contain “[t]he argument, divided under appropriate headings into as many parts as there are points to be presented . . . . ” The defendant has…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. RuscoeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. HorneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- State v. KellyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- State v. GilchristConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.