Legal Opinion
Roth v. Guzman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 13, 2011No. 10-3542PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RALPH B. GUY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Defendants Henry Guzman, Director of the Ohio Department of Public Safety, and Mike Rankin, Registrar of the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles, appeal from the district court’s determination that they were not entitled to qualified immunity from suit in this putative class action alleging violation of the plaintiffs’ rights under the federal Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA), 18 U.S.C. §§ 2721-2725, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Without challenging other aspects of the decision denying their motion to dismiss, defendants argue that their alleged conduct did…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- Johanna McDonough v. Anoka CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Jennifer Leech v. James DeWeeseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, PC v. BanksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Lynne Donovan v. FirstCredit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Jermaine Sutton v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.