Legal Opinion

Heimark v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided August 18, 1989No. 213-87 TPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RADER, Judge.

In 1982, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed a penalty of $68,513.78 against Andrew B. Heimark (plaintiff) for failure to pay the employment taxes of Getting Services, Inc. (GSI or corporation) during 1979. Plaintiff paid $350.94 of the penalty in 1986 and now seeks a refund of that amount. Defendant has counterclaimed for the unpaid balance of the penalty assessed under Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), 26 U.S.C. § 6672(a) (1982 & Supp.1985).

After a trial held on May 22, 1989, this court determines that plaintiff was not responsible for collecting,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Waymon Leon Howard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Dudley J. Godfrey, Jr., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Scott v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Bolding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Karen Kingman Kenagy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Henry Thomas Turpin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
  3. DiStasio v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  4. Ghandour v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
  5. Whiteside v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API