Beal v. Chase
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal in Chancery from Washtenaw Circuit.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
In this case there hare been two appeals taken. The *492last one was from a decree taken while the former was pending in this court, and was made as an additional decree upon no new hearing, and upon the case as presented to the circuit court when the first decree was made. As the statute expressly declares that on a chancery appeal “ all proceedings shall be stayed until otherwise ordered by the supreme court” (Comp. L., 1871, § 5181), a majority of us think the circuit court had no power to make the second decree, and that it should be reversed, but without costs, as the return was not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Phillips v. ThompsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Lessor of Fisher v. CockerellSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Kempshall v. StoneNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
- Hatch v. CobbNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
- Rakestraw v. LanierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- In re GreeneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Ohio · 1892
- Moore & Handley Hardware Co. v. Towers Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Archbell v. ArchbellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.